|
|
|
Main page Bible teachings Feedback |
 Translate this article into your native language: Translate the text |
|
|
The message of the Da Vinci code Contents
Foreword
Jesus Christ, Mary Magdalene and
the Holy Grail In his book Dan Brown
brings up a concept called Sangreal, which is familiar to the world by the
name the Holy Grail. Dan writes that sangreal is a collection of writings and
the Holy Grail itself which is not a cup. Dan tells us that Da Vinci knew the
location of the Holy Grail and painted IT. In his book Dan writes that if one
wants to know what the Holy Grail is then one first would have to understand
the Bible. After this Dan writes
in his book that the Bible is written by men and not by God. According to
Brown’s book man made the Bible a historical story, which has been modified by
countless translations, additions and corrections and the present Bible has
been collated by the emperor of Rome, Constantine the Great. Da Vinci Code
tells us that the Christianity of Constantine contains relics of paganism e.g.
mother child cult Isis Horus, out of which came Mary and infant Jesus, the
Egyptian halos, out of which came the halos of the church’s saints, mitre of a
bishop, the altar and eating God when partaking of the Communion come all
from paganism. According to the book
Jesus Christ was a significant historical person, and there is nothing
original in Christianity. Dan Brown writes in his book that Mithras god, who
was called the son of god and the light of the earth was born on the 25th
of December and when he died he was buried and he was risen on the third day.
The 25th of December was the birthday of Osiris, Adonis and
Dionysos. Dan tells in his book that originally the Christians kept the
Sabbath as they day of rest but Constantine changed it to Sunday (the first
day), which is the day of the sun. Then Dan writes in his book that most
Christians when sitting in their churches that they are not aware that they
sit there on the weekly day of worship of the god of sun. Also Dan Brown
writes that at the Council of Nicaea Constantine elevated Jesus as being
divine and made Jesus God since before that council Jesus was described as
mortal human being, true, a historical person. To “prove” this Dan writes that
the Dead Sea scrolls and the Nag Hammad texts tell the real stories of the
Holy Grail and Jesus. Brown writes that it was not God but man who formed the
idea of the fall that took place in Paradise. According to Da Vinci
Code, Da Vinci has painted the Holy Grail in his work The Last Supper and
according to the book The Holy grail is not an object but a person. According
to the book the Holy Grail ia also an ancient symbol of feminity and the Holy
Grail represents feminity and goddess which has been destroyed by the church.
According to the book it is Mary Magdalene who is the Holy Grail and whom Da
Vinci painted in his work the Last Supper. Also, the book claims that Jesus
was married to Mary Magdalene, because Jesus’ marriage sounds more reasonable
than the present idea of the Bible that Jesus was a bachelor. Then Da Vinci
Code book brings up the Gnostic gospel of Philip, which says: And the companion
of the […] Mary Magdalene […] loved her more than all the disciples, and used
to kiss her often on her mouth. The rest of the disciples […]. They said to
him “Why do you love her more than all of us?”
(The Gnostic Society
Library, the Nag Hammadi Library, The Gospel of Philip; translated by Wesley
W. Isenberg) To support the text
above the book says that every scholar in Aramaic language can tell you that
the companion meant specifically a spouse in Jesus’ days. Still addition to this
Brown tells us that the Gospel of Mary Magdalene says this: Peter answered…”Did
he really speak with a woman without our knowledge (and) not openly? Are we to
turn about and all listen to her? Did he prefer her to us?”…Levi answered and
said to Peter, “Peter, you have always been hot-tempered. Now I see you
contending against the woman like the adversaries. But if the Savior made her
worthy, who are you indeed to reject her? Surely the Savior knows her very
well. That is why he loved her more than us (The Gospel of Mary
Magdalene, BG 8502.1, Introduced by Karen L. King, Translated by George W.
Macrae and R. McL. Wilson, Edited by Douglas M. Parrott) After this Brown goes
further on in his story and tells us in his book that according to the
unchanged gospels Mary Magdalene was made the continuator of the church and
not Peter, that is why Peter was angry. According to Brown’s book Mary
Magdalene was Jesus’ right hand and of royal family. The book goes on and
tells us that the story of the Holy Grail is a legend of royal bloodline in
which the Holy Grail is Mary Magdalene and her womb which continued Jesus’
royal family as Jesus was the father of Mary Magdalene’s child. According to
Brown the Holy Grail, sang – real means royal blood and Mary Magdalene is the
mother of Jesus’ royal line of descent. The book goes on with always new
sensational points claiming that after Jesus was crucified, Mary, who was
pregnant fled the holy land and went to France where she gave birth to Sarah,
Jesus’ descendant to continue Jesus’ family tree. According to Da Vinci Code
book this why Mary Magdalene is the first ancestress of the royal family. Dan
Brown writes in his book that this is the reason why the Catholic Church does
not want this secret to be revealed to the world because that would deprive
Jesus off his divinity and the Catholic Church and Christianity off monopoly
of heaven. Also according to the book Jesus’ line of descent has continued to
our days. Christianity and
the relics of paganism The things that Dan
brings up about the relics of paganism are somewhat true. The mother child
cult came to the church from pagan religions, in Babylon Semiramus – Tammuz,
In Egypt Isis – Horus, in Rome Mater – Matuata. In Babylon
and in the other pagan cultures the religious leaders wore a head covering,
shaped like a fish head. In Babylon they believed that God walks wearing a
fish-shaped head covering on his head. This worship of fish God Dagon was
common also in Medes-Persia, Egypt, Assyria and Rome where also the popes
began to wear this head covering (mitra). Dagon is derived from the words dag
(fish) and on (sun). In Egypt
people worshipped the sun and in the altars there were
round waffles shaped like the sun made of unleavened bread. The Egyptian
priests prayed over the little waffles in order to make them holy. This bread
represented the body of the god of the sun and in the middle of it were the
initials HIS (Isis, Horus, Seb; the Egyptian trinity). Then they told the
people the a miracle had happened. They said that the waffles had changed into
the flesh of the sun-god Osiris and after that the people ate its’ god. This
Egyptian bread-god-ritual resembles almost perfectly the Catholic doctrine of
the Eucharist, in which the Catholic priest transubstantiates/changes the
bread into Jesus. In 354
Liberius ordained that the official birthday of Christ was the 25th
of December. Tammuz’ (dead god) birthday was celebrated on the 25th
of December in Babylon. The 25th of December was also Mithra’s (the
Persian god) and the Caesar’s (of Rome) birthday. There is no commandment in
the Bible to celebrate Chris’s birthday. Jesus did not impose the Christmas,
neither did the apostles and the early church did not celebrate Christ’s
birthday on the 25th of December at all. It goes without saying
that the Catholic church of Rome wanted Christ’s birthday to be the 25th
of December so that they could continue celebrating Tammuz. So there was
celebration in Babylon on the 25th of December. In Babylon the 25th
of December was the solstice and the birthday of sun-god Tammuz. The
Babylonian word “yule” means a child. The 25th of December was
called the yule day also among the pagan Anglo-Saxon. The Anglo-Saxon were
people who lived in the British Islands and who spoke Germanic languages. Also
in Scandinavia they had yule celebration, which took place on the 25th
of December and it was also the day of solstice. In Babylon Tammuz was called
also by the names of Baal-Berith and the Lord of the fir tree. The Egyptians
and the Persians celebrated their god’s birthday on the 25th of
December. Child-sun-god is referred to by several different names such as
Mithra, Horus, Isvara, Bacchus, Iacchus, Adonis, Attis etc. The origin of the
child-sun-god worship is in Babylon where Tammuz is the child. Thus the origin
of celebrating the birthday of the “divine” child on the 25th of
December is in Babylon from where it spread also elsewhere in the world. The
25th of December was a festival day in Rome as the feast of Tammuz
on the 25th of December has arrived there, too. In Babylon the
feast of Tammuz included a coniferous tree which was decorated with round
balls that symbolized the sun. The Babylons worshiped the sun that is why they
decorated the spruce with “sun balls”. The 25th of December
included a swine sacrifice, too. In 321 Constantine
made the sun day, that is Sunday, a rest day. The Laodicean Council ordained
in 364: “Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must
work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting
then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be
anathema from Christ.” Dan Brown was right in there that
Constantine changed Sabbath
to Sunday. Within the Catholic
Church there are some brave who have the courage to say which is the true
biblical rest day. What follows are some testimonies for the Sabbath by the
catholic:
Peter R. Kraemer, Catholic Church Extension
Society (1975),Chicago, Illinois.
"Regarding the change from the observance of the Jewish
Sabbath to the Christian Sunday, I wish to draw your attention to the facts:
"1) That Protestants, who accept the Bible as the only
rule of faith and religion, should by all means go back to the observance of
the Sabbath. The fact that they do not, but on the contrary observe the Sunday,
stultifies them in the eyes of every thinking man.
James Cardinal Gibbons, The
Faith of our Fathers, 88th ed., pp. 89.
Stephen Keenan,
A Doctrinal Catechism 3rd ed., p. 174.
James Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop
of Baltimore (1877-1921), in a signed letter.
Catholic Virginian Oct. 3,
1947, p. 9, art. "To Tell You the Truth."
Peter Geiermann, C.S.S.R., The
Converts Catechism of Catholic Doctrine (1957), p. 50.
T. Enright, C.S.S.R., in a lecture
at Hartford, Kansas, Feb. 18,1884.
Some Protestants testimonies, which have courage to say
what is the truth about Sabbath: Augsburg Confession of Faith
art. 28; written by Melanchthon, approved by Martin Luther, 1530; as published
in The Book of Concord of the Evangelical Lutheran Church Henry
Jacobs, ed. (1 91 1), p. 63.
Dr. Augustus Neander, The
History of the Christian Religion and Church Henry John Rose, tr. (1843),
p. 186.
John Theodore Mueller,
Sabbath or Sunday , pp. 15, 16.
Mary is not Jesus’
wife nor the continuator of the church Mary Magdalene is not
the Holy Grail nor is she Jesus’ spouse. The claims about Jesus’ wife are
based on the Apocrypha texts that lack the authorship of the canon of the
Bible. Also, the Da Vinci Code claims that Jesus made Mary Magdalene the
leader of the church. The Lord Jesus Christ himself is the head of the church
and according to the New Testament he left the continuation of the church on
the shoulders of the twelve apostles, not Mary’s, not Peter’s but on the
shoulders of all the twelve apostles. The disciple whom
Jesus loved According to the false
claim Mary Magdalene was Jesus’ wife. Mary Magdalene was not Jesus’ wife
because Jesus did not have a wife. This is clearly proved in the Bible: John 19: Luke 23:49And all his
acquaintance, and the women that followed him from Galilee, stood afar off,
beholding these things. The false information
says that Mary Magdalene is the disciple whom Jesus loved. But the Bible
disproves this. By the cross of Jesus were standing all his acquaintance (the
disciples), his mother (Mary) and his mother’s sister and Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene. Jesus was hanging on the cross and looked at his
mother and the disciple whom he loved and said to his mother. “Woman, behold
thy son!” Those words of Jesus reveal that the question was not of a woman
(Mary Magdalene) but of a man, which was John the disciple. In the same way,
making Mary Magdalene the continuator of the church is based on the unbiblical
gnostic gospels, that lack the authorship of the Bible’s testimony. The Catholic Church
teaches also wrongly about Peter as the pope referring to the gospel of
Matthew chapter 16 verse 18. The teaching of the Catholic Church is as
follows: Catholic catechism 880 When Christ instituted the Twelve, "he constituted
[them] in the form of a college or permanent assembly, at the head of which he
placed Peter, chosen from among them."398 Just as "by the Lord's
institution, St. Peter and the rest of the apostles constitute a single
apostolic college, so in like fashion the Roman Pontiff, Peter's successor,
and the bishops, the successors of the apostles, are related with and united
to one another."399 881 The Lord made Simon alone, whom he named Peter, the
"rock" of his Church. He gave him the keys of his Church and instituted him
shepherd of the whole flock.400 "The office of binding and loosing
which was given to Peter was also assigned to the college of apostles united
to its head."401 This pastoral office of Peter and the other
apostles belongs to the Church's very foundation and is continued by the
bishops under the primacy of the Pope. 882 The Pope, Bishop of Rome and
Peter's successor, "is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the
unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful."402
"For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as
pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the
whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered."403
These teachings
are
completely against the Bible. The biblical shepherding means that a local
church is led by the elders to whom the Bible refers to also by the names of
bishops, shepherds and leaders. Thus the church is not
led by one man and from outside but it is led by those within the church in
certain locality. In the second century A.D. Ignatius, who was in the church
of Antioch claimed one man leadership position in the church and as a result
he rose to a higher position than the other elders and started to call himself
by the name of a bishop. The word bishop came from the Greek word episkopos,
whish means BISHOPS (elders, shepherds). Those elders that were under bishop
Ignatius were called presbyteros, which means the elders. Thus, the
word bishop referred then to only one elder of the local church. Next the
bishop was inducted into leadership of a whole province or a larger area. The
bishop was then responsible for several churches and not just one. This kind
of abandonment of the independency of the churches permitted the development
that resulted in the birth of nation-wide and international churches and
revivalist movements with the denominational leaders against the word of the
Bible. When the pope originated in the Catholic Church, it was justified by
this distorted position of the bishop. A track of errors led to great
deception. Jesus doesn't build congregation on the foundation of man,
because He is the head of congregation. What this verse is teaching?
Because Jesus is the head of the congregation, and nobody other, so I will
write next to clarify this matter, even though the Bible don't tell direct to
this matter; Jesus said by indicating Peter on His finger and said; you are
Peter (petros) Jesus continued by indicating on His finger to Himself and said;
and upon this rock [
Eph 5:23: For the husband is the head
of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour
of the body.
We look over next at few Bible places, which indicate clearly who really is
the rock in the word of God. 1 Cor 10:1-4 (petra) that followed them: and that Rock (petra) was Christ. Spiritual
Rock and the head of the Church is Jesus Christ not Peter. Rock words in this Bible place are in Greek petra. The Rock is Jesus
Christ. Room 9:33
Isa 8:14
Stumbling stone and rock of offence is Jesus Christ. In this verse word
rock is in Greece text petra. This verse is quotation for Isa 8:14. Jesus is
the rock, not Peter. Psalms 62:6 Psalms 89:26 Rock of salvation is Christ Jesus, in the clear salvation
plan of the Bible. In these places is Hebrew word tsur, which means God and
rock. This tsur means so God and rock. So the message of the Bible about it
that who is the rock is completely clear, the rock is Jesus Christ. Catholic Church teaches, that when in Aramaic text Matt
16:18 is word Cephas = rock, so Peter is that rock where Christ found His
congregation; and that Peter was the first Pope. That kind of teaching is
absurd claim, because we cannot find it in the Bible. In the Bible is not word
Pope. And the Bible also proves to us that God is the rock and not a man. Roman Emperor Constance "turned" to Christianity 312 A.D
and he was pontifex maximus (high priest). Constance took for himself a name
vicar Christi (vicar of the Christ). From the new religion of Constance came
common (catholic=katholikos). So from the citizens of Rome was made
“Christians” without regret and conversion. But very interesting is, that in
Greek text of NT is not Greek word katholikos= catholic. So Jesus
Christ and Peter and Paul did not teach anything about Catholic Church, but
they taught from church (congregation) of God. The last supper Dan brown claims in
his book that at the last supper next to Jesus was sitting Mary Magdalene, who
was Jesus’ spouse. According to all four gospels those who were having the
last supper were the twelve disciples, the apostles that Jesus had chosen,
and they were all men. Bible’s testimony proves the claim of Dan Brown’s book
to be a lie because at the last supper there were only men present. Leonardo Vinci’s work
The Last Supper is a product of his imagination and does not really present
the real occasion nor the persons being present but is imaginative and
influenced by Gnostic stories, and based on these Leonardo has pictured Mary
attending the last supper. Leonardo created every person in his work using his
imagination and none of them really looked like as he has pictured them since
Leonardo did not paint his work from life but he painted an event that had
taken place ca. 1400 years before Leonardo was born. How was the New Testament born? Brown said
that it was Constantine who put together the present Bible. The early church
read the existing scriptures the first of which were of course the Old
Testament books. After that the New Testament texts were spread to the church
the latest of which was completed in 96 A.D. The Bible tells us that the
epistles of the apostles circulated in the churches which means that their
epistles were available to be read in the churches of God from very early on.
Paul knew about the existence of Peter’s epistles and likewise Peter knew
about the existence of Paul’s epistles. Thus long before the birth of the
Roman Catholic Church the canon was completed and in the use of the church.
The Roman Catholic Church did not bring about the canon but brought into use
the already existing books and epistles which were recognized by others and
which were in the use of the early church in their entirety. Apostle Peter
wrote his epistles to the believers in Asia Minor and Asia. It appears from
Peter’s writings that Paul’s epistles were read in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia,
Asia and Bithynia. So, Paul’s as well as Peter’s epistles were read in the
churches in Asia Minor and in Asia. Also The Revelation of John was read
in the seven churches in Asia after it was finished in 96 A.D. It is apparent
from the previous Biblical information that the epistles of the apostles
were copied and sent to the existing churches. Paul said to the Colossians
that his epistle was to be sent to the church of Laodiceans, and be read
there, too. The epistles of the apostles were thus spread to the existing
churches of God and little by little they spread all places where churches of
God existed. E.g. Clemens of Alexandria (ca. 150- ca. 215 A.D.) knew all the
texts of the New Testament and regarded then as the word of God. The word of
God and its’ teaching has thus been in the use of the church of God all the
time throughout its’ history. The Roman Catholic Church canonized the Bible
and gives the picture that it has given the Bible to the mankind because this
way it would have the monopoly position in interpreting and teaching the
Bible. The Catholic Church of Rome did not give us the New Testament canon but God did
through the writers of the New Testament. The Catholic Church of Rome thus canonized
the already existing books based on the letters that the church had. Claiming
to have canonized the New Testament the Roman Catholic Church wants to seal
the false teachings that they market as the “truth” to the mankind. Marcion, who was said
to be a Gnostic heretic (ca.85-160 A.D.) did a new canonization of the New
Testament of his own. Marcion accepted only the Gospel of Luke and ten of
Paul’s epistles into his canon. I state now that our “church history” is
rather one-sided because the Catholic Church killed its’ opponents and
destroyed their works and has put the imprint on its’ opponents that we can
read in history books. The historical records of the Roman Catholic Church can
thus be considered biased since it has destroyed once existing texts. Thus the
actions and historical records of the Catholic Church can not be considered
reliable in all respects. As for Marcion, I will not take a stand for nor
against him, but I do state that Gnosticism is a heretical teaching. Still,
the incomplete canon of Marcion was one of the most powerful reasons which
later led to the official canonization by the church. The incomplete canon of
Marcion and the heretical teachings were the starting shot for the official
canonization of the New Testament texts by the Roman Catholic Church. The
Roman Catholic Church rose against the heretical teachings and that is why it
made the official canonization but still at the same time before and after the
official canonization the Roman Catholic Church itself taught e.g. these
heresies: 375 A.D. 378 A.D. 381 A.D. After these years more
and more pagan doctrines became the teachings of the Catholic Church. What is
remarkable is that in 1546 the Roman Catholic Church canonized the Apocrypha
that were considered heretical by the church fathers. Thus, the Bible of the
Roman Church includes also the works of the heretics. The Gnostic Gospels The so
called Apocrypha of the New Testament (The Gnostic Gospels) do not belong to
the books of the Bible and most of them were written in the second century or
later; so they are much younger than the canonical texts of the New Testament.
The latest canonical text The Revelation saw the light in ca. 96 A.D. The
Revelation of John ended the chain of Divine revelation, its’ message was for
that time and will be till the final moment of mankind’s earthly history. So,
no new revelation was needed anymore because the revelation concerning the
whole historical era of mankind was already given. And before that everything
that is essential was already said and brought up. The Apocrypha of the New
Testament was born much later than The Revelation of John. Also this tells us
that the new revelation was from man and did not have the Divine authority
since The Revelation of John was the end of God’s biblical revelation history.
The Apocrypha of the New Testament share one feature: they show the influence
of Gnosticism. The features characteristic of the Gnostic texts are also the
following: Gnosticism placed itself in a higher position than Christianity and
Gnosticism did not believe that Jesus was God. The foregoing features prove
themselves that Bible’s teaching can not be proved with the Gnostic Apocrypha,
because Gnosticism placed itself higher than Christianity and believing Jesus
to be an ordinary man made them people who did not want to have biblical faith
but rather they wanted to prove it wrong elevating their own faith. Thus the
Gnostic texts can no way be considered the original texts of Christianity or
works belonging to Christianity because the Gnostics regarded Christianity as
their enemy and the Gnostics’ faith was “orthodox”. In reality the Gnostics
were in the same boat of deception than the church institution; they had
different kind of teachings but the inspiration for the teachings came from
the same source: the headquarters of darkness. The early
church did not consider the Gospels of Philip and Mary Magdalene biblical
because they were not canonical. The Gospel of Mary saw the light in the 3rd
century and a slightly modified version of it appeared in the 5th
century, in which woman’s position as a disciple was slightly changed; and in
addition to that the Gospel of Mary belongs to Gnostic-Egyptian Christianity
thus lacking the authority of the Bible. Thus, Brown’s claim about unchanged
texts falls through. The Gospel of Mary was also born more than one hundred
years after the last biblical text was born. The Gospel of Mary belongs to the
Apocrypha of the New Testament, it lacks the biblical authority, so its’
message is to be discarded and it has nothing to do with the truth. The birth
of the Gospel of Philip is dated in 180-250 A.D. at the earliest, so it too
was born much later than the biblical texts. The Gospel of Philip is full of
Gnostic thoughts. In the Gospel of Philip a wife is referred to with a word
sime but at the point which Brown brings up the word koinonos, which
appears in Greek New Testament nine times, does not even once mean a wife but
a companion and fishing companion. In the light of all above Da Vinci gives
once again a false statement; the word companion does not mean a wife and Mary
was not Jesus’ wife. Dan Brown gives Jesus a minor role and makes Mary
Magdalene and sacred feminity the hero of the book.
There were
different views prevailing in Gnosticism, e.g. some Gnostics taught that
divinity is accomplished uniting man and woman. This idea also led some
Gnostics to pursue divinity through sexual intercourse between a man and
woman. But there were also Gnostics, who abstained for sexual relationships.
When we are aware of the fact that the Gnostics considered the Christians
their enemies, and that they considered themselves better than the Christians,
and they wanted to show in every way that Christianity was wrong, we
understand why the so called Gnostic Gospels were born which aimed to defame
and distort the real gospel. The Gnostics went so far in this that they wrote
the Gospels “anew” by distorting them; they pictured Jesus an ordinary man,
who was united with divinity through Mary Magdalene. The Gnostic claim that
Mary Magdalene was Jesus’ wife suited the Gnostics because that way they tried
to claim that their own doctrine was true and their thoughts were supported.
The idea of Jesus being married (uniting with divinity through woman) is a
Gnostic Gospel. In the same way that another group, the abstained group, got
more grist to their mill claiming through the “new” Gospels that Jesus was
leading a sinful and immoral sex life. This way both groups used the “new
gospels” as their spokesmen for attacking the Christians and the message of
the Bible. That was a clever plot to defame others, but fortunately we know
that the source of inspiration for these Gnostic texts has been in the
headquarters of darkness, and the Bible has the truth about these things. The
Bible does not tell us that Jesus was married, and He really was not married
because he was not born to this world to get married but to die as the
sin-offering for the sin of the world The
message of Dan Brown’s book It is
apparent from Dan’s book that he wants to change the history convenient for
himself ( to be in line with Gnosticism). As a student of many religions he
does not only write fiction because in spite of the errors of the book
concerning the Bible and Jesus, there were also historical facts in the book.
Dan also as a student of spirituality (he says that he studies all religions)
markets (pushes forward) his faith on others through the novel, very clever,
isn’t it? In his book
Brown clearly brings up the elements, that Christianity has changed the
original values that have prevailed in the world and that we should return to
these values. The things that should be restored are: - faith in goddesses - faith in sacred feminine - forsake your faith in the
Bible and have faith in the Gnosticism - prepare your mind to receive
antichrist's religion - attack against real
disciples of Jesus Christ and word of God The
prophesies of the Bible The Bible
prophesies that in the last days the same things will happen as is the message
of Dan Brown’s book. The Bible shoes that they are the fruit of apostasy and
work of darkness; while Dan Brown considers them divine “enlightening”. Dan Brown
shows the way to goddess worship. The Bible prophesies that mankind is reigned
by many whores (religions), whose source of strength is mother religion, that
elevates herself to a queen. This mother religion makes woman a goddess, whish
means, that the ancient goddess faith returns to deceive the mankind. That
suits well the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, since the Roman Church
has taught all through its’ history that Mary is the queen of heaven. In
Babylon this queen of heaven was Semiramis, she was also a goddess. The
goddess cult came from Babylon, and was called Isis in Egypt, Astarte in
Phoenicia, Afrodites in Greece and Venus in Rome (Isis was worshipped in Rome,
too). The teaching of the Roman Catholic Church about Mary is just the same as
the above mentioned religions have. The Catholic Church says that it only
respects Mary, not worships her, but the truth is that is some prayers of the
Catholic Church Mary is described as the mediator of salvation, through the
intercession of whom a Catholic will go to the glory of resurrection. This is
why the Catholics pray (and worship) Mary. 2. Tim.
3: Dan Brown
brings up the idea of sacred feminity that includes faith in the goddess and
divinity that is accomplished through man uniting with woman in sexual
intercourse. The Bible teaches that in the last days the mankind is seized
with pleasures (Greek: philedonos – a friend of hedonism) and that they love
pleasures more than they love God. After mentioning the pleasures, the Bible
continues straight to teaching that people have a form of godliness but they
deny the power thereof. The mankind in the last days is seized with sexual
pleasures and people approve of almost all kind of sexuality, also
homosexuality. In Dan
Brown’s websites there is his interview concerning the book Da Vinci Code. In
this interview Dan Brown says that he is a student of all religions. This
statement of his is aptly describes the people in the last days; they have a
form of godliness but still they forsake the real power and true God. This is
exactly how the Bible describes the people in the last days; they regard
themselves as divine but the power of God is not good enough for them and they
choose deception and the power of apostasy. The people in the last days are
happy with any religion and any belief except the belief in the God of the
Bible. The mankind in the last days is thus in the spirit of polytheistic
tolerance in which each can choose to himself a way of his own to believe
having itching ears and all will do except the God of the Bible. Jesus said
that all peoples will hate His disciples in the last days. This is undoubtedly
partly because Jesus’ disciples will not approve of the wrong polytheistic
divinity of the last days. God breathed
The Da
Vinci Code says that the Bible is written by men, not by God. According to
Brown the Bible has changed in the course of time due to additions and
corrections. The Bible proves that God of the Bible is the right and
only God and other gods are idols and other religions announcements can't lead
people to the truth. The Bible tells very accuracy about the creation of the
earth and mankind and about the history of mankind and its end when Jesus
Christ comes. The Bible tells that one day Jesus Christ will come back when
the whole world can see Him. The Bible tells also large catastrophes which
will take place in the end of the days before Jesus comes. We are very near of
that day when Jesus Christ comes, read Matthew chapter 24. The fall According
to the Da Vinci Code the fall is man’s own invention. With this claim Dan
Brown express his support for the God declining range of thoughts that has
seized most of the mankind. This claim of Brown’s also leads the consciences
of men to impenitence to carry out all kinds of sinful lusts and deeds. The
fall is a biblical fact that is proved to be true e.g. by Jesus’ words that
the people of the world will hate Jesus and his followers because a sinner
hates light and does not want his sins to come to light. This is the truth.
The man of this world is tolerant when the religion “gives it’s blessing” to
his sin but when living faith shows sin as sin he then violently attacks and
tries to defame God and living faith. The
Bible is true Some
amazingly accurate prophesies that have come true show that the Bible is the
word of God because man is not capable of scoring a bull’s eye what comes to
prophesies come true:
Gathering Israel and rebuilding the land Ezekiel
34:13 And I will bring them out from the people, and gather them from the
countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon mountains
of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the country. - (time
of writing in 593- 571 B.C. –has been coming true since the end of the 19th
century till the year 2006 and forwards…) The Jews
were in exile for centuries scattered everywhere among the peoples. But in the
end of 19th century the Jews started to return to their own
country, like the prophesies say. Ezekiel 34:13 says what has taken place that
is God has already gathered a big part of the Jews back to their own country.
In 1948 the Jews officially established the state of Israel!
-
(written in ca. 750 B.C.) Jer
32:43 And fields shall be bought in this land, whereof ye say, it is
desolate without man or beast; it is given into the hand of the Chaldeans. 44
Men shall buy fields for money, and subscribe evidences, and seal them,
and take witnesses in the land of Benjamin, and in the cities of Judah, and in
the cities of the mountains, and in the cities valley, and in the cities of
the south: for I will cause their captivity to return, saith the LORD. -
The prophecy that came trough Amos and Jeremiah speaks of
the same thing that Ezekiel 34:13. But Amos 9:14,15 is an accurate description
of what happened when the Israelites returned to their own land. The land was
governed by the Turkish for ca. four hundred years, when they put a tax on the
trees that were growing in the area. As a result of these trees was destroyed
because they did not want to pay tax on them. This resulted in large areas
becoming swampy and parched. When the state of Israel was born in 1948, the
Jews had to pay a high price for these swampy and parched areas. The
Israelites started to cultivate the land and they rebuilt the waste cities and
planted vineyards etc. Thus, these prophecies of Amos and Jeremiah have come
true perfectly according to the Scriptures! Isaiah
51:3 For the LORD shall comfort Zion: he will comfort all her waste places;
and he will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of
the LORD; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice
of melody. -
Prophet
Isaiah said that the Lord will restore the land of Israel and will make it a
paradise. This has already come true to a great extent in the land of Israel.
In the 20th century the Jews have cultivated the land and thus made
much of the land a fruitful agricultural land again. The many swamp areas in
the land of Israel, which have been tainted by malaria, have been cultivated
to fruitful agricultural land. From the Sea of Galilee (Lake Gennesareth) they
have conducted water to the wilderness which, as a result of this, has begun
to flourish and has become fruitful. Some parts of the land of Israel do not
flourish yet but large areas in the land of Israel have already become
fruitful land. In the end of the 19th century Israel was described
as wilderness, but today Israel produce food for many countries and more than
200 million trees have been planted in the land of Israel after the end of the
19th century. God will
gather the people of Israel from all counties Ezekiel
34:13 And I will bring them out from the people, and gather them from the
countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon the
mountains of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the
country. - (written in ca. 593-571 B.C. – began to
come true in the late 19th century) Ezekiel
34:13 began to come true in the late 19th century. In1948 Israel
became independent and the state of Israel was established and since then
there has been a strong migration of the Jews to Israel. The migration of the
Jews to Israel is going on all the time. Thus, also this prophecy has been
coming true and has in part already come true. Isaiah
43: 5,6 Fear not: for I am with thee: I will bring thy seed from the
east, and gather thee from the west; I will say to the north, Give up; and to
the south, Keep not back: bring my sons from far, and my daughters from the
ends of the earth; - (written in ca. 701-681 B.C. – has already
come true to a great extent) Prophet
Isaiah said, that the Jews will return to their homeland from the east, from
the west, from the north and from the south. One is to remember that Isaiah
lived for ca. 2700 years ago and what has happened to the Jews and to the land
of Israel after that! In 732 the Assyrians carried the northern kingdom of
Israel captive to ASSYRIA. Then Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah and carries the
people away. In 605 B.C. the first part of Judah was taken to Babylon. In 588
B.C. after Jerusalem had been taken, more of the people of the tribe of Judah
were carried away. Then in 70 A.D. the Romans destroyed the city of Jerusalem
and killed many and expelled hundreds of thousands of Jews from their own
country. Since that the Jews have been scattered in almost every country of
the world. But in the 20th century millions of Jews have returned
to their homeland Israel from the east, from the west, from the north and from
the south. From the
east: Many Jews from the Middle East moved to Israel in the beginning of the
20th century. From the
west: In the middle of the 20th century hundreds of thousand of
Jews who were living in the west (Europe and the United States) began to move
to Israel. From the
north: The former Soviet Union (Russia) is situated in the north when viewed
from Israel. The Soviet Union (Russia) did not allow the Jews to move to the
land of Israel but restrained that. But many countries have for years put
pressure on the Soviet Union (Russia) to let the Jews return to their own
country. Finally, in 1980 the Soviet Union (Russia) allowed the Jews to return
to their own country. Till today, hundreds of thousands of Russian Jews have
moved to Israel. From the
south: Ethiopia, which is situated in the south when viewed from Israel also
restrained the Jews from returning to the land of Israel. But anyway in 1985
Ethiopia made the decision that the Jews are allowed to return to their
homeland Israel. On the 25th of May 1991, 14 500 Ethiopian Jews
were flown to the land of Israel. Isaiah’s
prophesy hit upon the right thing since he said: “I (the Lord) will say to the
north, Give up; and to the south, Keep not back”. Also this prophecy has come
literally true since both the Soviet Union and Ethiopia had to give way and
let the Jews return to their own country, and there is a constant migration of
the Jews from Russia to Israel going on. Isaiah’s
prophesy hit upon the right thing also in the sense that the Jews returned
from the ends of the world to their homeland Israel. During the last one
hundred years the Jews have moved back to Israel from China, The United
States, South Africa and Scandinavia, so, that is really from the ends of the
EARTH.
Jerusalem will be a cup of trembling and a burdensome stone for all people
Zechariah 12
-
(written ca. 520-518 B.C.)
In the last days Jerusalem will become a cup of trembling
to all the people of Israel, since there is the word am in the text,
which means the people of Israel, but in this context it means Judah. This
trembling means that it will be a bone of contention and all satan’s lies and
hatred will be concentrated in Jerusalem and this is also why the Jews will
face world’s pressure on Israel and Jerusalem. Also all the peoples/gentiles (gojim
= gentiles) will turn against Israel. Verse 2 says that Jerusalem will be a
cup of trembling also to Judah, which means that something will happen inside
Israel that some Jews will accept the plans to destroy Israel. With these
plans to destroy Israel I do not mean bombing the city to the ground but
dividing it what the Muslims are striving for. In the last days Jerusalem and
dividing it will be put pressure on, and some Jews will agree to do, but in
the end God will prevent this plan from coming true…so they will “burden
themselves with it”, but in the end God will condemn it and gives Jerusalem
back it’s unity and at the same time God will bring salvation to the Jews.
Verse 3 speaks about burdening oneself with Jerusalem and
in the original text there is the word amas, which means to load or
carry. So in the last days the question is of carrying a part of Jerusalem to
the Palestinian Arabs, but God says in His word as follows: Ps 122:3 (AV)
Jerusalem is builded as a city that is compact together; Jerusalem is
built (in David’s days) as a city that was composed of the upper and lower
city, that were united and is one city. In the psalm God confirms that
Jerusalem is not to be divided because it is compact together. However, in the
end God will put things as His will is and Jerusalem will one day be an
undivided city! This prophesy also shows that Jerusalem will be a cup of
trembling and a burdensome stone for all people and that is has verily been.
God has stated also this beforehand in His word.
Divinity of Jesus
Dan Brown writes in his book that the Council of Nicea made
Jesus God, and not the Bible. In 325 A.D. in Nicea they correctly rejected as
heretical the teaching of Areios, that Jesus was created and hence not God.
The Bible proves that Jesus
is God and the Bible has been written long before the council of Nicea.
Jesus saith unto him, Rise, take up thy bed, and walk. And immediately the man was made whole, and took up his
bed, and walked: and on the same day was the Sabbath. The Jews therefore said unto him that was cured, It is
the Sabbath day: it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed. He answered them, He that made me whole, the same said
unto me, Take up thy bed, and walk. Then asked they him, What man is that which said unto
thee, Take up thy bed, and walk? And he that was healed wist not who it was: for Jesus
had conveyed himself away, a multitude being in that place. Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and saith
unto him, Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come
unto thee. The man departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus,
which had made him whole. And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought
to slay him, because he had done these things on the Sabbath day. But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and
I work.
Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him,
because he not only had broken the Sabbath, but said also that God was his
Father, making himself equal with God.
Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily,
I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the
Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all
things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that
ye may marvel. For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth
them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all
judgment unto the Son: That all men
should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not
the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my
word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not
come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. John 5:8-24
The Jews who knew well the Scriptures, saw what Jesus did
and said, and they said to Jesus that he had made himself equal with God. It
is interesting that no prophets of the old covenant or Moses, or any servant
of God was ever accused of making themselves equal with God. And what makes
this so interesting is that during the days of Elijah also, the dead were
raised and the sick were healed. And through Moses, and many others too, God
worked mightily, but they were never accused with such an accusation. The
reason why Jesus was accused of making himself equal with God, was that Jesus
was not an ordinary man as all the others, like Elijah, Moses etc., were. Jesus
is God and the Son of God, and this is why He acted and behaved the way that
made the Jews to accuse Him of blasphemy.
I and my Father are one. Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you
from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me? The jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone
thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest
thyself God.
John. 10:30-33
Jesus said that He and His Father are one. In the Greek
text, there is the word one in verse 30 (as in the King James version
in which there is a faithful translation of the verse: I and my Father are
one.)
The Jews said that Jesus is a man who makes himself God.
Jesus said that He and the Father are one and for this - "blasphemy"- the Jews
wanted to stone Jesus. Jesus and the Father truly are one. The Bible teaches
that God is one. That word one is echad in Hebrew, and it means one,
first, some, only, united. Jesus said that He and Father are one, which truly
means that Jesus Christ is God. This does not mean that Jesus is the Father
like they teach in some denominations. The Bible teaches that God is one in the
Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. Since Jesus Christ is not the Father,
He is the Son of God.
And after eight days again his disciples were within,
and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the
midst, and said, Peace be unto you. Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and
behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be
not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my
God.
Jesus saith unto
him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are
they that have not seen, and yet have believed. And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of
his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus
is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through
his name.
John 20:26-31
The disciples too said that Jesus is Lord and God. Jesus
confirms the testimony of Thomas by saying: “because thou hast seen me, thou
hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.”
Thomas would have been guilty of blasphemy by saying that Jesus is God if He
were not, and in that case Jesus should have rebuked Thomas for blasphemy. But
since Jesus is God, He did not have to rebuke Thomas, but he only confirmed
Thomas’ words “My Lord and my God” by saying that you believe that I am your
Lord and your God, and because you have seen Me, you believe. Blessed are
those who do not see Me and yet believe. We, who did not see Jesus in His days
of flesh, but believe that Jesus is the Lord and God, we are blessed. Jesus is
God according to the Bible.
The Bible says that God
created man in His own image:
Genesis 1:26 And God
said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the
cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth
upon the earth.
Let us make man – includes the message that the Son
together with His Father made man in the image of God. So, based on creation
too, Jesus Christ is God.
The Bible says that the
Son (Jesus) was with His Father creating the heaven and the earth (and man):
Col 1:12-22 Giving
thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the
inheritance of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and
hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the
forgiveness of sins:
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn
of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in
heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones,
or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,
and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things
consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the
beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the
pre-eminence.
For it pleased the Father that in him should all
fullness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his
cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether
they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in
your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled. In the body of his flesh through death, to present you
holy and unblemeable and unreproveable in his sight:
Conclusion to the reader
Dan Brown’s claims about Jesus’ mortality, and him not
being God, and that He was married to Mary Madgalene, have proved to be lies.
Instead the Bible and the history and the future prove the Bible to be the
word of God. So, the one who believes in God shall not say amen to the
deceptions of Dan Brown’s book. But also where Dan Brown has hit upon the
right thing revealing pagan relics in the church institution, the believer
should humble him self and obey the Bible and stop maintaining those many
pagan relics which are wrapped up in lies in the teaching of the church
institution.
And You, who are not saved yet, Lord Jesus wants to save
you. The Bible teaches that all come short of the glory of God. The Bible
teaches that the wages of serving sin is everlasting death that is destruction
which is the end of all those who do not want to receive salvation which is in
Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ died for you in the middle cross in Golgotha, so
that you could have everlasting life.
The death on the cross does not automatically bring man the
forgiveness of sins. First was the message of the cross preached and those who
repented and received the Word and believed in Jesus, only for those is the
cross the place of forgiveness of sins. Those who do not repent and do not
believe in Jesus, to those the cross proclaims death and condemnation. So,
repent and receive the free gift of God which is salvation in Jesus Christ. To
repent means that you turn away from your sin life and begin to walk in
newness of life through God’s grace. Thus man can not get saved otherwise that
through Jesus’ death on the cross which is counted for those who repent and
turn away from sin. This is what the Bible teaches, the grace of God, which
only can save man from serving sin.
http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney01172004.html
http://www.teolinst.fi/tiedotteet/Da%20Vinci%20-koodi.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/09/world/main642450.shtml
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_Dei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar
http://www.religionfacts.com/da_vinci_code/leonardo_da_vinci.htm
http://www.occult100.com/satan100/topsites.shtml
http://www.odan.org/tw_how_opus_dei_is_cult_like.htm
http://www.odan.org/testimonies_and_writings.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagram
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory_of_Sion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen
http://www.mdep.org/sect19.html
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/69/story_6980_1.html
http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temppeliherrain_ritarikunta
http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viisikanta
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Seurakunta%20vai%20kirkko
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Johtajuus%20Jumalan%20seurakunnassa
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Jumala%20on%20yksi
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Seitsemas%20paiva
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/UudenTestamentinKaanon.html
Close-up of Dan
Brown
Dan Brown tells
about his book
The story begins
The Cilice
Opus Dei
Leonardo Da Vinci
Jesus Christ,
Mary Magdalene and the Holy Grail
"2) We Catholics do not accept the Bible as the only rule of faith. Besides
the Bible we have the living Church, the authority of the Church, as a rule to
guide us. We say, this Church, instituted by Christ to teach and guide man
through life, has the right to change the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament
and hence, we accept her change of the Sabbath to Sunday. We frankly say, yes,
the Church made this change, made this law, as she made many other laws, for
instance, the Friday abstinence, the unmarried priesthood, the laws concerning
mixed marriages, the regulation of Catholic marriages and a thousand other
laws.
"It is always somewhat laughable, to see the Protestant churches, in pulpit
and legislation, demand the observance of Sunday, of which there is nothing in
their Bible."
25 Now there stood
by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of
Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.
26 When Jesus
therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he said
unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!
27 Then saith he to
the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her
unto his own home.
Matt
16:18-19,
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter
(Petros),
and upon this rock
(
1 This
know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For
men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud,
blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce,
despisers of those that are good,
4
Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having
a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
1 The
burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth
forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the
spirit of man within him.
2
Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round
about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against
Jerusalem.
3 And in
that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people (am): all
that burden (AMAS?) themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the
people (gojim) of the earth be gathered together against it.
4 In
that day, saith the LORD, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his
rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and
will smite every horse of the people with blindness.
5 And
the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in the LORD of hosts their God.
6 In
that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the
wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the
people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be
inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem.
7 The
LORD also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of
David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify
themselves against Judah.
8 In
that day shall the LORD defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is
feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David
shall be as God, as the angel of the LORD before them.
9 And it
shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek destroy all the
nations that come against Jerusalem.
10 And I
will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the
spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they
have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his
only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in
bitterness for his firstborn.
Petri Paavola from Finland
Sources:
Finnish Bible 33/38
Old King James version
Da Vinci-koodi: Dan Brown (the book - Finnish version)
Da Vinci-code: Ohjaus Ron Howard (the movie - English version and Finnish)
http://tmatt.gospelcom.net/column/2006/05/10/
http://www.danbrown.com/meet_dan/faq.html
http://www.danbrown.com/meet_dan/index.html
http://www.danbrown.com/novels/davinci_code/faqs.html
http://www.danbrown.com/novels/davinci_code/bibliography.html
http://www.answers.com/main/most_popular.jsp?date=2006-06-12
http://www.nowpublic.com/why_dan_brown_wrote_the_da_vinci_code_kalki_bhagwan
http://davincicode-opusdei.com/?p=62
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15674a.htm
http://jasperadventist.org/bib-ld2.htm
http://almightywind.com/wolves/sabbathchanged.htm
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/ccc_toc.htm
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/profetiat_toteutuvat.html
https://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Jeesus_on_Jumala
